How do measures that define climbing difficulty work?

Climbing is as much about physical strength and technique as it is about understanding and evaluating difficulty. When climbers set out to conquer a new route or problem, one of the first things they’ll assess is the difficulty. But how is climbing difficulty actually defined? How do climbing grades work, and why do different grading systems exist? And how do climbers assign a grade to a boulder problem?

In this post, we’ll explore the concept of climbing grades, the different grading systems in use around the world, and how a grade is determined for a boulder problem.


Climbing Grades: The Basics

Climbing grades are systems designed to quantify the difficulty of climbing routes or problems. They help climbers understand what to expect from a climb, providing a scale for comparing different routes or problems. The idea is to give climbers an idea of how tough a route will be, based on factors like the technicality of the moves, the steepness of the wall, and the type of holds available.

Grades help climbers assess their abilities and train to reach new challenges, but they can sometimes be subjective and vary depending on the grading system used. Still, grades offer a standardized way to describe difficulty and allow climbers to compare their progress over time.


The Different Grading Systems

There is no universal grading system for climbing, and the type of climbing often dictates the grading system used. There are several major grading systems, and they can differ in how they describe difficulty. Let's take a closer look at some of the most popular grading systems used in climbing today.


1. The V Scale (for Bouldering)

One of the most well-known grading systems for bouldering is the V Scale, developed by John Sherman in the 1990s. The V Scale ranges from V0 (the easiest) to V16 (and beyond, as difficulty increases). It's mainly used in North America, and it's focused on the difficulty of individual boulder problems.

How the V Scale Works:

  • V0 to V4: Beginner to intermediate boulder problems, often requiring basic techniques like smearing, using large holds, or simple dynamic moves.
  • V5 to V8: More challenging problems that require more precise footwork, powerful moves, and difficult body positioning.
  • V9 and beyond: Advanced and expert-level problems that often require extreme strength, technique, and mental focus to complete.

The V scale doesn't use decimal points or fractions, unlike some other climbing grades. A V5 problem is considered harder than a V4 but easier than a V6.

Why the V Scale Works: The simplicity of the V Scale makes it easy to use for outdoor bouldering and indoor gyms alike. It’s useful because it assigns a grade based on the actual moves and technique involved rather than relying on length or other factors.


2. The Fontainebleau (French) System

The Fontainebleau grading system, named after the famous bouldering area near Paris, France, is widely used in Europe. It’s similar to the V scale but uses a slightly different structure to define the difficulty of bouldering problems.

How the Fontainebleau Scale Works:

  • The Fontainebleau scale begins with 4 (beginner level) and goes upwards, adding + and - signs to further differentiate between sub-difficulties.
  • For example, a 6A is considered a moderate problem, while a 6B is a little harder, and a 6C is more difficult.
  • As the problems get harder, the numbers move into the 7s, 8s, and even into the 9s for extremely difficult problems.

The system allows for a more nuanced understanding of the difficulty level, as grades can be fine-tuned with the + and - distinctions, giving climbers a better sense of relative difficulty.

Why the Fontainebleau Scale Works: The Fontainebleau system is popular in Europe and is often used for bouldering due to its ability to reflect the subtleties of different problems. It helps climbers more precisely categorize problems, making it easier to judge how challenging a problem might be based on their own experience level.


3. The YDS (Yosemite Decimal System) for Sport and Trad Climbing

The Yosemite Decimal System (YDS) is widely used in the United States for sport climbing and trad climbing. It’s a comprehensive system that not only measures difficulty but also reflects the level of danger and experience needed for a climb.

How the YDS Works:

  • Class 1–3: Easy hiking or walking.
  • Class 4: Scrambling, where the use of hands is required to ascend, but no technical climbing gear is necessary.
  • Class 5: Technical climbing requiring ropes, protection, and climbing techniques. The YDS grades start here with 5.0 to 5.15.
  • The system includes decimal sub-grades to further differentiate difficulty. For example, a 5.10 climb might have a 5.10a, 5.10b, 5.10c, or 5.10d, and each represents a progressively harder level of difficulty.
  • Once the difficulty surpasses 5.12, it can be split into 5.12a, 5.12b, etc., all the way up to 5.15 for extreme levels of difficulty.

Why the YDS Works: The YDS is the most widely used grading system for sport and trad climbing. It covers both the difficulty and technicality of a route, helping climbers understand what they’ll encounter from an ease-of-climb perspective as well as a safety one.


How to Define a Grade for a Boulder Problem

Assigning a grade to a boulder problem involves several factors. It’s not as simple as just scaling a wall or estimating how high the climber will go—climbing grades take into account technical difficulty, physicality, moves involved, and the nature of holds. Here's a breakdown of the process:

1. The Moves:

The difficulty of the individual moves within a boulder problem is key to determining its grade. Climbers consider how challenging each move is, whether it requires explosive power, strength, balance, flexibility, or mental focus. Problems with dynamic (fast and forceful) moves or small, crimpy holds will often be graded harder than static, controlled problems with big jugs.

2. The Sequence:

The sequence of moves can impact a problem's grade. If there are particularly tricky sequences that require precise technique or if there’s a need for specific footwork or body positioning, the grade might be higher.

3. Height & Protection:

In bouldering, height is a factor in how difficult a problem feels, although it's secondary compared to technique. If a problem is tall, it can raise the stakes because falls become more risky. The use of crash pads and the general fall potential can influence the perceived difficulty as well.

4. The Holds:

Different types of holds, like slopers, pinches, crimps, or slabs, can determine a climb’s grade. Smaller, more difficult holds typically push the grade up.

5. Consensus & Experience:

Finally, climbing grades are often subjective and can vary depending on the climbers' experiences. Often, once a problem has been climbed by a few people, a community consensus emerges. This consensus helps adjust the grade to more accurately reflect the difficulty based on feedback from multiple climbers.


Conclusion: Understanding Climbing Grades

Climbing grades provide a structured way to assess difficulty, but they’re not always perfect. They’re meant to offer climbers guidance on what to expect, but grading systems can vary widely depending on geography, type of climbing, and even individual climbers' experiences. The main takeaway is that grades are an imperfect but useful tool for measuring the challenge of a climb, helping climbers gauge their skills and progress.

Whether you’re bouldering, sport climbing, or tackling a trad route, understanding grades—and knowing the grading system used—will help you make informed decisions about what challenges to tackle next. The variety of grading systems ensures that every climber can find a suitable method for evaluating and improving their climbing experience.

Back to blog

Leave a comment